Angry Birds Jurassic Pork Level 37-16 Walkthrough

@sweetp @karen68 and @hunnybunny :
after playing this episode on and off for some time now, i think i qualify
for the (ultra) sharp shooter badge (reading the rules for those).
for a change (didn’t see other people qualifying via abo)
it’s in an angry birds (original) episode: jurassic pork.

my score(ranking) overviews for the three worlds, where
scores are confirmed by three pictures (*) in my album grouped per world,
and where rankings are for today 19-2-2019 and also confirmed
by pictures in my album grouped per world, are:
world 35
183430(3), 183150(2), 196380(4-5)
234810(1), 244310(1), 268690(1)
235360(2), 228410(3), 330160(4)
253290(1), 292010(8), 395900(1)
287010(1), 193080(1), 299360(4)
world 36
165400(3), 274980(6), 179250(1)
175690(1), 243220(1), 214000(5)
202600(1), 206930(3), 215240(2)
348530(5), 295600(1), 200990(6)
219600(1), 154250(7-11), 216500(5)
world 37
98040(2), 98820(5), 146490(2)
106000(4),140820(1), 168440(1)
193390(3), 249900(2), 190480(1)
287480(2), 264420(1), 295570(2)
195340(2), 229860(2), 207990(3)
233660(1)
in total 10244920(1).

the only explanations needed are for 36-14 where my ranking as indicated
on abn currently is 11, but my 154250 score is equal to that of annach ranked number 7,
and for this level 37-16 (which did not fit into the 5 x 3 picture format), for which you
can find a screenshot in the message to which this one replies.

all levels played on ipad air 11.1.11 (15B150). angry birds HD 7.8.6.49541.

what i was and am playing for currently is a total score of 10,250k in
jp (i mentioned some time ago i thought this was reachable; still think it is,
but it’s not easy), but then i remembered @kathy mentioning the (ultra) sharp
shooter badge, and that she thought i could qualify.
since i thought it would be a nice goal i now spent some time
on levels with few points in them (which i would otherwise not have played),
just to improve my rankings.

although hunnybunny thought (see the forum) the “utter nutter” badge (all scores in top 5) can
only be done in space, i think that is in reach as well in jp. currently i have only
four scores in jp that are out of the top 5, but of course while playing for those my other scores could
easily be bumped down the rankings (although the risk is not that high: not many people
playing and i have only twelve scores out of the top 3; the chances of three
persons beating one of my top 3 score are low, except maybe when the level is the daily challenge).

somewhat ironically, the levels that took the most time to get into the top 5 had
little to do with shooting sharp (with learning and trying to improve the aim/strategy),
but everything to do with luck (at least i think there’s no strategy involved in say 36-14).
this is not a complaint about lack of luck (i was very lucky on some jp levels, e.g. 35-12),
but just to say that `sharp shooter’ is a bit of misnomer.

in olympic sailing competitions one is allowed to drop the worst results to
take bad luck/accidents out of the equation; i know, that’s a different set-up, but just
to say that other measures of quality of play can be imagined,
say taking average/variance of scores for a level into account (how
much above average are your scores?), or adding up the rankings
(as in sailing, maybe with dropping one or two) and dividing by the number of levels
(in my case 37/15, 48/15, and 34/16 for the worlds, making it 119/46,
that is something like an average ranking of 2.6)

(*) the pictures i have uploaded are of high enough quality, but look rather poor
on the site i see; i hope it’s good enough anyway (first had tried uploading higher-resolution
versions, but that didn’t work; abn then after some time after clicking the upload button
produced a blank page and nothing happened (no warning either); maybe because
the file (8.1MB) or resolution (6140 x 7680) was too large?). if not let me know.